Analysing your
brand equity and brand positioning
Why do people buy the things they buy and why should they choose you? Is there a gap in the market?
Brand equity is the intangible value of a brand.
It can be thought of as the values the brand is perceived to have, in comparison with its competitor brands in the same category.
- The strengths and weakness of each brand, ways in which they appeal to consumers in the category and shortcomings
- Brand associations – we learn what consumers associate with each brand
- When used with our Market Category Analysis, we can identify missed opportunities – consumer wants and needs that brands are not addressing
- Buyer personas discovered through segmentation analysis and the brands each tends to buy
To analyse brand equity, researchers use a combination of implicit and explicit tests.
Many purchases are said to be based on nonconscious, gut-reactions. In other words, consumers find it difficult to fully account for their buying behaviour, especially why they choose one brand over another. Implicit response tests, through the IAT or affective priming, is a technique that has its origins in Fazio, Sanbonmatsu, Powell, and Kardes (1986) and has been used to understand the formation and expression of preferences (e.g., Steinman & Karpinski, 2009; Friese, Wänke, & Plessner, 2006). Although it is one of the least expensive techniques in the neuromarketing range of techniques, it can provide more information as to WHY people choose the products they buy at a detailed level.
Implicit tests measure consumers’ subconscious associations with a brand. These are associations such as emotional responses and automatic thoughts. Implicit reaction tests provide valuable insights into how consumers truly feel about a brand. These insights go beyond what respondents may express in a survey or focus group.
Explicit tests, on the other hand, measure consumers’ conscious attitudes towards a brand. These are attitudes such as their perceptions of the brand’s quality, reliability, and value. Explicit tests provide valuable insights into how consumers rationally think. They may rationally weigh the pros and cons of a brand when making purchasing decisions.
References
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C. & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
Friese, M., Wänke, M., & Plessner, H. (2006). Implicit Consumer Preferences and Their Influence on Product Choice. Psychology & Marketing, 23(9), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20126
Steinman, R. B. & Karpinski, A. (2009). The breadth-based adjective rating task as an indirect measure of consumer attitudes. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37, 173-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.2.173
Great things can happen in a split-second
Start A Conversation
Complete an enquiry form to arrange a meeting with us:
Our blog
Rethinking What “Losing Relevance” Really Meant for MTV
By 2010, the media landscape was moving fast. New digital music channels were emerging, and MTV was picking up an uncomfortable signal from conventional research: surveys and focus groups suggested the brand was losing relevance with
Understanding Emotional Responses to Fragrance in Context
A global fragrance company wanted to profile how four new fragrances were experienced, with a specific focus on their functional emotional use.
The goal was to understand which fragrances naturally support different emotional states, for example, which scents help calm or reduce anxiety in work environments, and which feel more appropriate in contexts requiring reassurance or comfort, such as high-trust or service-led settings.
This introduces a more
The Three Pain Points of Commissioning Market Research
When people answer survey questions, their responses are influenced by many factors: social desirability, rationalisation, or simply the difficulty of articulating instinctive reactions. As a